Infringement Contentions (May 12, 2021): HCMC is due to obeying dispute showing violation in the following areas (these are generally exchanged between the parties and not made public or submitted publicly with sensitive information redacted): HCMC will identify each accused apparatus, method, composition, or other instrumentality (“Accused Instrumentality”) of each accused party that is known to the claiming party and that is alleged to have been infringed by each opposing party and (c) each accused patent in suit that each opposite party allegedly infringes. In the absence of an extension of time, the parties will file this report and plan, which is the result of the parties’ Rule 26(f) meeting and conference and contains numerous details, including, among other things, the progress of the settlement discussions, a proposed schedule of the case for fact locating motion practice, expert discovery, and trial, and a proposed plan of the case for settlement negotiations. (4) Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan Prepared in Collaboration (April 12, 2021). In the absence of a time extension, the Prime Minister will have the opportunity to respond to the opposition brief submitted by HCMC regarding the MTD. (3) The Prime Minister’s Response to the HCMC’s Opposition (March 25, 2021): They may also meet through videoconference. The parties must meet to attempt to settle the case, discuss the discovery, limit issues, and discuss other topics. This meeting is held in secret with the leading lawyers for all parties involved in the case. (2) Meeting and conferring under Rule 26(f) (March 15, 2021): That request is granted freely, and the MTD would be temporarily overcome. Furthermore, I would anticipate that HCMC will ask the court to order the correction of any defects in their complaint if the court finds that there are any defects. (c) testimony, in the form of a declaration, stating that it is not dispositive, based on The denial of the MTD will almost certainly be the consequence of a well-written opposing brief that hits those arguments. It is reasonable to anticipate some form of resistance, which may include arguments that (a) dismissal is not warranted because discovery has not yet occurred and discovery is required to decide whether ignition is a process that occurs in the accused devices, (b) dismissal is not warranted in the absence of claim construction that interprets, amongst other terms, the term “combustion,” Without a request for an extension of time, the City of Hong Kong’s opposition to the PM’s MTD is expected on or before March 11, 2021.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |